Gloom Is Good: The Rise of the New Pessimists

“Greed is good,” Gordon Gekko told us in 1987 (echoing and perhaps parodying Ayn Rand‘s long-running, uber-egoistic economic cant). For all we know, he may be gearing up to deliver us a repackaged version of the same message later this year when Wall Street 2: Money Never Sleeps hits theaters. But regardless of what Gekko’s message in that forthcoming sequel may turn out to be, there’s another message that is gearing up for a major groundswell right now, and its orientation is not in question. It can be phrased as a modification of Gekko’s famous maxim: Gloom is good.

I say this based on just two pieces of evidence, but both of them fascinate me — especially since they hail from diametrically opposite ends of the socio-political ideological continuum — and I have a gut feeling that they will soon be joined by more items pointing in a similar direction.

The first is John Derbyshire’s We Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism. I became alerted to Derbyshire‘s existence and writings last September when he mentioned H.P. Lovecraft, whose appearances in public discourse I am always assiduously following, and who, as it turns out, Derbyshire has rightly regarded for some years as a fellow conservative and fellow pessimist who held a cheerfully grim view of the human prospect. Such an attitude and temperament is entirely congenial to Derbyshire’s own, and thus there’s no surprise in the publication of the man’s new book, which is dedicated to the proposition that “the conservative movement has been derailed, by legions of fools and poseurs wearing smiley-face masks.” He argues that “conservatism has been fatally weakened by yielding to infantile temptations: temptations to optimism, to wishful thinking, to happy talk, to cheerily preposterous theories about human beings and the human world,” and it can therefore “no longer provide the backbone of cold realism that every organized society needs.” Obviously, the book is diametrically opposed to the tenor of the interminable Obama campaign — a fact that’s brought home by Derbyshire’s use of exclamations such as “No, we can’t!” and charming terminological reversals such as “The audacity of hopelessness.”

I bought the Kindle edition a few days ago and am positively reveling in the man’s incisive humor and sharp thinking. The book is both laugh-out-loud funny and quite thought-provoking with its heavily researched and serious call to abandon vapid optimism and embrace a serious realism in the form of a fundamental pessimism about human affairs.

Here’s a current favorite passage from chapter three, which is winningly titled “Politics: Show Business for Ugly People.” The topic is the quantifiable devolution of presidential rhetoric toward triviality and idiocy in recent decades:

William Henry Harrison, in his fatal inaugural address, likened liberty to “the sovereign balm for every injury which our institutions may receive.” George H. W. Bush, in his inaugural address, likened it to a kite. “Freedom is like a beautiful kite that can go higher and higher with the breeze,” he proclaimed. We may be only a president or two away from hearing liberty compared to a chocolate fudge sundae.

Second, there’s Bright-Sided: How the Relentless Promotion of Positive Thinking Has Undermined America, written by one of the most visible champions of progressive social and economic thought in recent years, Barbara Ehrenreich. According to the official description, the book “exposes the downside of America’s penchant for positive thinking: On a personal level, it leads to self-blame and a morbid preoccupation with stamping out ‘negative’ thoughts. On a national level, it’s brought us an era of irrational optimism resulting in disaster.”

I was alerted to its existence by Kerry Howley’s thoughtful review at, titled “It Takes a Village Atheist: Barbara Ehrenreich’s jeremiad against cheerful thinking.” Howley summarizes how Ehrenreich was inspired to write the book when she was diagnosed with breast cancer and subsequently found herself ensnared in a Kafka-esque world of enforced optimism among her doctors and fellow cancer sufferers, who rejected any budding expressions of unhappiness or negativity out of hand and tended to condemn and exclude those who persisted in such folly. Ehrenreich traces this attitude through American evangelicalism and economic thought, focusing on the obvious effects of such “irrational exuberance” (I don’t know if she uses that term itself) in, for instance, the financial markets.

And I, to highlight the obvious point, find the near simultaneous arrival of these two books — We Are Doomed hit bookstores in September 2009, Bright-Sided in October — to be more than a little noteworthy. Here’s hoping we’ll see a healthy slew of such writings throughout the new year. (Actually, for all I know this may already be occurring; I didn’t check before composing this post.) For the past couple of years the propaganda about an economic “recovery” has been polluting public discourse, mostly courtesy of mainstream financial and economic voices and, of course, government leaders at both the federal and state levels. The word “recovery” implies the re-attainment of a former state of healthfulness. The United States has been anything but healthy, economically speaking and in all sorts of other ways, for a very long time now. President Obama, as James Howard Kunstler pointed out in his recent forecast for 2010,

speaks incessantly and implausibly of ‘the recovery’ when all the economic vital signs tell a different story except for some obviously manipulated stock market indexes. You hear this enough times and you can’t help but regard it as lying, and even if it is lying ostensibly for the good of the nation, it is still lying about what is actually going on and does much harm to the project of building a coherent consensus. I submit that we would benefit more if we acknowledged what is really happening to us because only that will allow us to respond intelligently. What prior state does Mr. Obama suppose we’re recovering to?  A Potemkin housing boom and an endless credit card spending orgy?

It’s time for a new realism. Gloom is good, especially amid current circumstances. The fact that this recognition is erupting on both the right and the left bodes well.

About Matt Cardin


Posted on January 6, 2010, in Religion & Philosophy and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. 3 Comments.

  1. Great to see you connect the horrific with politics, even if your stance may not be met with great receptivity. I was beginning to think I was the only one feeling pessimistic about our “recovery.”

  2. Hey, we pessimists have lots of good company these days, despite the superficial cheerleading that’s clogging some of the airwaves. If you’re feeling gloomy about the so-called economic “recovery,” on any given day you can find your feelings fact-checked and verified at the forums at Or at the Breaking News page at Life After the Oil Crash. Or at James Howard Kunstler’s blog. Or The Archdruid Report. Or the various discussions at Ticker Forum. Or The Daily Reckoning. Or Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis. Or Financial Sense University. And so on. There’s pessimism aplenty to go around.

  3. Benjamin Steele

    I like that you included a book by a conservative and a liberal. Some conservatives think they own the rights to pessimism, but I must admit I’ve never understood some conservative views that verge on cynicism.

    Some conservatives believe human nature is fallen. Since you can’t change people and human solutions will fail, we have to give up on helping people in this world and instead we must try to save their souls. And some conservatives believe humans are entirely selfish creatures. Since humans are inherently greedy, we must place our faith in the enlighteneed selfishness of capitalism.

    There are other types of conservative pessimists as well. There is the type that dreams about the way the world once was. They idealize some idyllic view of early America or else they cling to some vague ‘white culture’. And there is the type that is pessimistic about populism and democracy. They believe in some kind of plutocratic meritocracy where we should trust the power and authority of the wealthy class (because, after all, they’ve earned our submission whether or not we offer it to them willingly).

    I find myself appalled at the social darwinism and political shrewdness that presently represents much of conservative pessimism. I’m not sure what the alternative is. I haven’t read either book you mention in this post, and so I don’t know what either author writes about. I have watched some videos of Ehrenreich and so I have a general sense of her viewpoint.

    I’m a pessimist, but I’m not sure of what variety. I resonate with Derrick Jensen’s pessimism. Although Jensen’s perspective is more liberal, it certainly isn’t aligned with mainstream liberalism. I’ve always been curious about liberal strains of libertarianism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.